The Nuremberg Trials: An International Responsibility to Uphold Justice
  • Home
  • The History of International Law
    • International Conventions & Treaties
    • Enforcing Early International Law
  • The Road to Nuremberg
    • War Crimes and Crimes Against Peace
    • Crimes Against Humanity
  • The Trial
    • The London Charter & Trial Preparation
    • Trial Proceedings
    • Verdicts & Sentences
  • Immediate Effects
    • Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings
    • International Military Tribunal for the Far East
    • The Cold War & Delays in Progress
  • Legacy
    • The Nuremberg Principles
    • Ad-hoc Tribunals for Rwanda and the Former Yugoslavia
    • The International Criminal Court
  • Required Materials
    • Bibliography
    • Process Paper
    • Interview Transcripts>
      • Ingo Eigen on IMT
      • Dietlinde Joens on German Reaction
      • Ingo Eigen on Nazi Regime
      • Professor William Schabas on International Law Today




"The prosecution in the final speeches has treated the defendants and their testimony, as completely worthless. The statements made under oath by the defendants, were accepted as absolutely true when they could serve to support the indictment, but conversely, the statements were characterized as perjury when they refuted the indictment."



- Göring's final statement
Mary Joens, Senior Individual Website
Proudly powered by Weebly